Those of you who read last night's post have seen the strange painting begun under the influence of Clausen and Bastien-Lepage.
You may recall that my point was that we should each place ourselves way out of our comfort zone from time to time. For me, that means portraits and figures. So I essayed a figure in a landscape, one with a high horizon.
I mostly embarrassed
myself, but I think it got a bit better today.
Nonetheless, I
need some help from the portrait painters among you. I promise to reciprocate
when you have problems with a meadow---honest.
and a Pre-Raphaelite sensibility. And all I had wanted was George Clausen's honesty.
As it turns out it's very soft, but that rather fits with the idealized sense I have of the painting and with the rather palpable innocence of the young man.
So I
beseech the portrait painters among you to come to my aid. While
keeping the
feeling, what should I do? Because the whole process is so terrifying for me, I
get very timid about corrections (needed though they be). So I need you to tell
me in no uncertain terms.
And, like I said, if you need help with a brook or a mountainside, I'm here to help.
Thanks.
For the
longest time---despite the fact that I couldn't paint a portrait, or a
figure---I wanted to paint like Sargent. I wanted that luscious swoop of a
loaded brush, conquering all before it. I wanted the sureness and the bravado,
and the whole alchemy of his technique.
I never
really tried to paint in Sargent's manner (aside from anything else I couldn't
afford all that paint), but I'm sure I secretly believed that JSS, or Zorn, or
Sorolla was lurking within me, just
waiting for me to liberate him.
It took
me many years to realize that I painted best when I was most true to myself.
That meant in terms of both subject and technique. As much as I might admire the
bravura stroke, it's not part of my personality.
It's a hard lesson to learn, this realizing that maybe you aren't going to be a giant, that you won't be the John Sargent of your time.
It's a hard lesson to learn, this realizing that maybe you aren't going to be a giant, that you won't be the John Sargent of your time.
But look
at it another way. Sargent became Sargent by being true to himself. Perhaps
Sargent pined to be John Kensett or Ingres, but found the goal at odds with his
own temperament.
Thus do
we all hope to find that particular marriage between our temperament and our talent.
If you are serious with wanting feedback, I would be happy to tell you what I think. At the Florence academy of Art they didn't sugarcoat criticism so I won't. For someone who never paints portraits it has many good qualities. However if you want more form you will need more value. The darks could go darker. There are not many various edges, firm up edges around the eyes, nose and mouth and under the chin. Darken the white of the eye as well. Nothing is more difficult than painting a figure from imagination, I would look at some reference. Now that is my opinion, you will find some who completely disagree but as for academic representation you can look at my work and decide if my opinion has any merit. Nice work.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Matt. I'll see what I can do today. The general light in the painting is quite flat and even, so I haven't too much range to stretch the values. Edges, on the other hand, need attention, and I'll work on them today. Thanks for taking the time. I do need to be careful that he maintains his revenant quality, too.
Delete